JanMell Vanity Scripts #04: “Abolition of Man” doesn’t mean “Everyone going gay.”

May I interject something? Actually that query is quite unnecessary because I certainly will interject something. With all due respect, will you please cut the crap about homosexuals and how they piss you off and instead go back to what you are supposed to discuss, that is, Science and Technology and its impact to the society? If it would make me feel enlightened can I ask ask you how your opinion that gays are indecisive about things as much as their gender contribute to our value judgments about—again—Science and Technology and its impact to the society? If you think that hesitating to read my essay out loud in front of the class is so gay, and thinking twice is a hallmark of gayness, don’t you also think twice on things that pose as an advantage yet upon second thought, can jeopardize you in the long run? Are we then, including you, all gays? I would like to make this clear to everybody. There is no room for idiosyncrasies of a bigoted chauvinist in here. Not when I am around. An opinionated person such as you will always clash with an opinionated person like me. The natural property of impenetrability and the Pauli Exclusion Principle both implies we cannot be at the same place at the same time, especially when one is speaking his mind. This is not acknowledgment of defeat but it would be a pleasure if you will graciously excuse me while I show myself out.